The Podiatry LinkedIn Power List
I wanted to find the top 20 podiatrists to follow on LinkedIn. I've spent three years building a presence here, and I use AI extensively for work and research, so I went to Claude and asked the obvious question: who are the top LinkedIn voices in podiatry.
I'm on the list. That's not the point.
The point is that AI tools are becoming the new front door to credibility and searchability. Everyone has gotten a message from someone with a blank profile or a handful of scattered posts, and everyone has quietly moved on because of it. That instinct only gets stronger as AI becomes the first stop for vetting a name instead of the last one.
This is a snapshot in time. The race is already running.
A note on method. LinkedIn hides follower counts for most individual profiles: you'll see "500+ connections" and nothing else. A small number of profiles cross a threshold where LinkedIn exposes a real follower number publicly. Where that number exists, I used it. Where it doesn't, the ranking runs on verifiable signal instead: national office, funded ventures, published honors, content substance. Every number below is sourced from a live LinkedIn page, not an estimate.
I asked Claude to do the research and I let it run. I corrected it more than once along the way. That correction process was its own lesson in what's searchable and who gets left out of it.
The first pass missed the single biggest name on the list entirely. Worth sitting with that for a second. It's a reminder that "who's loud" and "who's actually followed" are not the same list, and the second one is harder to compile because most of podiatry's real reach sits behind a wall that just says "500+."